Tuesday, February 05, 2013
Censoring the Language of Sexual Abuse
Numerous Orthodox Jewish websites censor the word "sexual" in the   context of discussing sexual abuse. Such censorship sends the message to   young people that body parts, sexuality and sexual abuse are so   shameful, that adults can't even mention them in public.
By refraining from using words such as "sex" and "sexual," Orthodox   Jewish websites are unwittingly sending the message that sexual abuse is   not something that should be discussed. This only perpetuates the   existing shame, secrecy, stigma and fear surrounding the issue of sexual   abuse.
Parents of pre-adolescent children certainly have a right to   determine the age-appropriate language when discussing sexual abuse with   their children, but that is no excuse for websites censoring terms   necessary to define abuse.
If children are old enough to be on the Internet, they should be   mature enough to hear the word "sex" or "sexual" in the context of   discussing abuse.
 RAINN (Rape, Abuse & Incest National Network), the nation's   largest anti-sexual violence organization, recommends "[t]alking openly   and directly about sexuality" in order to teach "children that it is   okay to talk to you when they have questions." In a sexual abuse   awareness seminar held in Crown Heights, experts explained that a lack   of education makes adolescents more vulnerable to abuse.
The lack of discussion around the human body, intimacy and sexual   issues, in essence, robs children of the ability to speak because they   are not provided with the proper language.
Maintaining Halachic standards of Tzniut (modesty) does not conflict   with the necessity of discussing sexual abuse openly and candidly.   Tzniut concerns laws related to modesty of both dress and behavior—when   dealing with normal, healthy interactions—not when educating the public   on the dangers of sexual abuse.
The Talmud relays a story of a student that hid under his teacher's   bed to learn how his teacher was being intimate with his wife. The   student commented on the inappropriate language of his teacher to which   his teacher exclaimed, "Get out! It's not proper (for you to be here)!"   To which the student replied, "It is Torah—and study it I must."
In contemporary society, the student might be accused of   voyeurism—but this story illustrates the need to rise above the taboos   of discussing sexuality. There is nothing shameful, sinful or obscene   about having candid conversations about the subject – particularly in   the context of educating the public on sexual abuse.
When the language center is shut down, the abuse survivor is less   likely to speak, because they are fearful of voicing what is perceived   as shameful, and so, sometimes, they can't even articulate their trauma.
Censoring the use of accurate language around sexual abuse   perpetuates the notion that such discussions should be secret and such   language is shameful. Living in secrecy is painful and damaging to an   abuse survivor. We need to empower potential victims to talk openly and   candidly about their experience.
http://www.algemeiner.com/2013/02/05/censoring-the-language-of-sexual-abuse/
			Comments:
			
			Post a Comment
		
	
	
