Sunday, June 11, 2006
Chasidishe woman arrested for 'stealing' pocket book
A Chasidishe woman was arrested in a sting operation by the NYPD at the Atlantic Street train station for 'stealing' a pocket book. The pocket book was intentionally left by the NYPD as part of a sting operation to collar criminals that would take the pocket book instead of returning it to the Transit Authority. In New York City items found in the subway must be turned in to the Transit Authority. The woman took the pocket book and began to walk off. Within moments she was jumped by a half dozen Police Officers and was handcuffed and taken away before even being asked what her intentions were.
In another such a case where a 21 year old male was arrested in such a sting operation a Judge dismissed the charges on the grounds of entrapment.
A Chasidishe woman was arrested in a sting operation by the NYPD at the Atlantic Street train station for 'stealing' a pocket book. The pocket book was intentionally left by the NYPD as part of a sting operation to collar criminals that would take the pocket book instead of returning it to the Transit Authority. In New York City items found in the subway must be turned in to the Transit Authority. The woman took the pocket book and began to walk off. Within moments she was jumped by a half dozen Police Officers and was handcuffed and taken away before even being asked what her intentions were.
In another such a case where a 21 year old male was arrested in such a sting operation a Judge dismissed the charges on the grounds of entrapment.
Comments:
for your informatoin out there she did not take it with the intention to steal it she had the intentoin to returm=n it number after a person from crown hieghts with conetctoins pulled some strings she was let out within an hout with out having to go to sentre booking and the judge is expected to drop the case
Comment Credit ---This article posted by 
: June 11, 2006 2:26 AM
: June 11, 2006 2:26 AM
Maybe she was planning to return it, but, first was going to look for the name of the owner.
Comment Credit ---This article posted by : June 11, 2006 9:12 AM
: June 11, 2006 9:12 AM
you have to be don lecaf zechus. maybe she was planning on turning it in or calling the person it belonged to once she found out who it belongs to
Comment Credit ---This article posted by : June 11, 2006 11:01 AM
: June 11, 2006 11:01 AM
And where is your Link to a reliable source to this Story? or did you just make up the story?
Comment Credit ---This article posted by : June 11, 2006 1:09 PM
: June 11, 2006 1:09 PM
Comments:
for your informatoin out there she did not take it with the intention to steal it she had the intentoin to returm=n it number after a person from crown hieghts with conetctoins pulled some strings she was let out within an hout with out having to go to sentre booking and the judge is expected to drop the case
================================
GOD ALMIGHTY.
Where have you learned to spell english.
If you can not spell or speak english DO NOT embaress yourself by commenting here.
There are plenty places to comment in a foreign language ie Yiddish , Hebrew
for your informatoin out there she did not take it with the intention to steal it she had the intentoin to returm=n it number after a person from crown hieghts with conetctoins pulled some strings she was let out within an hout with out having to go to sentre booking and the judge is expected to drop the case
================================
GOD ALMIGHTY.
Where have you learned to spell english.
If you can not spell or speak english DO NOT embaress yourself by commenting here.
There are plenty places to comment in a foreign language ie Yiddish , Hebrew
Comment Credit ---This article posted by : June 11, 2006 3:51 PM
: June 11, 2006 3:51 PM
And what if she could find no name inside - is she not Halachikly allowed to keep it? Is it not an avaidah?
Comment Credit ---This article posted by : June 11, 2006 4:13 PM
: June 11, 2006 4:13 PM
And if instead of a "Chasidishe" woman or a "Heimishe" woman (as she was referred to on another blog that reported this story), if the woman who found the purse and began walking off with it had only been a secular "shaygetz" Jewess, or even a "shiksa" or a "schvartze," would you be so quick to assume that her motives were benign and innocent instead of this being a case of presumed g'neva? And in the latter case, if some black "reverend" like Herbert Daughtry, Wyatt Tee Walker or even Fats Sharpton himself or some other "community leader" had gotten her quickly sprung from jail, would you be complaining that "the 'schvartzes' get away with everything?"
Comment Credit ---This article posted by : June 11, 2006 8:10 PM
: June 11, 2006 8:10 PM
I don't care what her intentions where. If it's a crime, it's a stupid law that needs to be changed. If I find a wallet in the street I am allowed to keep it but not in the subway. Besides, how can the cops prove what my intent was? It's a stupid law.
Comment Credit ---This article posted by : June 11, 2006 9:36 PM
: June 11, 2006 9:36 PM
Anon at 3:51:
"GOD ALMIGHTY"
You make it sound like the worst possible crime not to spell correctly.
Oh, and the best part: you EMBARRASSED yourself as well!!!!!!!! (note the second "a")
"GOD ALMIGHTY"
You make it sound like the worst possible crime not to spell correctly.
Oh, and the best part: you EMBARRASSED yourself as well!!!!!!!! (note the second "a")
Comment Credit ---This article posted by : June 11, 2006 10:50 PM
: June 11, 2006 10:50 PM
how can one hve the chutzpah to belive such a crum thing like this
Post a Comment
Comment Credit ---This article posted by : June 15, 2006 8:31 PM
: June 15, 2006 8:31 PM
